Monthly Archives: April 2015

Lest We Forget


On Sunday, April 12, 2015, Pope Francis at a Mass in the Armenian Catholic rite at Peter’s Basilica quoted a declaration by Pope John Paul II in 2001 which resulted in the Turkish government recalling its ambassador to the Vatican just after the government of Turkey called the Vatican’s ambassador to Turkey to Ankara for an explanation of the Pope Francis’ comments.

The offending comments? He called the massacre of Armenians in 1915 the “first genocide of the 20th century.” The Turkish government does not deny the deaths happened, they deny it was genocide.

Here are just four of the many reasons that the Turkish government says there were deaths, but no genocide:

1- because the killings were not deliberate or systematically orchestrated.

2- the killings were justified because the Ottoman Empire (the predecessor of the Republic of Turkey) was at war with Russia and the Armenians posed a Russian-sympathizing threat as a cultural group to the security of the country.

3-the Turkish World War I casualty figures are cited to lessen the effect of the number of Armenian dead.

4-the word “genocide” was not invented until 1943, and the Armenian deaths occurred during World War I, more than 20 years before the word was invented. So, therefore it cannot be called a genocide.

Ok first I never like the argument “We didn’t do it” (1) and “if we did we were justified” (2). Double-speak just does not get the job done. If you did not do it, then how can you be justified in doing it? Sorry guys, these two do not wash.

It is true there were many Turks, Greeks, and Armenians killed during World War I. But, the difference is the sheer numbers of women and children who were killed is what shows that what happened to the Armenian people was clearly a genocide. If the Turkish government wants to compare “apples and apples,” then let’s look at the statistics of Armenian women and children and compare that to the deaths of women and children Turks and Greeks. The numbers will not seem so even then.

The last one (number four) is one of my favorites. There are so many ways to disagree with that statement. But, I am just going to use one.

Law professor Raphael Lemkin is the man who is credited with coining the term “genocide.” What was the inspiration which brought about this one single word? What act was the impetuous that spurred its creation? According to professor Lemkin, it was the Armenian Genocide. So, according to Lemkin the killings in Turkey of the Armenian people inspired his creation of the word genocide. But, according to the Turkish government what happened to the Armenian people in Turkey was not a genocide, because the word had not been invented when the massacres happened. This looks like another contradiction to me.

I think more telling is the massive numbers of foreign diplomats, military advisors, and foreign aid workers in Turkey at the time who were sending back reports to their respective governments concerning what was happening to the Armenian people in Turkey. One of those countries was Germany.

Many of the German military advisors and diplomats who witnessed the atrocities in Turkey would later take what they learned and use that knowledge to help Hitler attempt to achieve his “final solution” to the “Jewish problem.” When searching the backgrounds of Nazi war criminals many of them were in the Ottoman Empire (modern day Turkey) during World War I, men like Konstantin Freiherr von Neurath. The death marches, concentration camps, and labor camps of Nazi Germany were all copied from the Ottoman Empire and its dealings with the Armenian people. Even the Nazi SS were modeled on the Ottoman “Special Organization.” The men in the Special Organization were mostly prisoners released from prison for the express purpose of annihilating the Armenian people in Turkey. The destruction and confiscation of Jewish property in Nazi Germany was all carried out against the Armenian people during World War I by the Ottoman Empire.

The Russians, of course, were at war with Turkey during World War I, and the military was sending back reports on the large number of Armenian civilians they were finding dead in the wake of the retreating Ottoman military. The scene the Russian military saw in the city of Erzurum was so atrocious that they retaliated against the Ottoman 3rd Army by destroying it entirely. The 3rd Army was the group the Russian military held responsible for the massacre at the city of Erzurum. This is important because the Turkish government uses the connection between the Armenians and the Russians to justify the genocide they say they did not commit.

The reason for the close connection at that time between the Armenians and the Russians was religious. Both peoples are Orthodox Christians. The Armenians were being oppressed in the Ottoman Empire. Under the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians because they were Christian instead of Islamic, were treated like second-class citizens. Armenians could not testify in court because they were not considered to have integrity like Muslims. Their rights were routinely violated and Muslims committing criminal acts against them were not arrested, but simply ignored. Crimes like murder, rape, theft, destruction of private property and etc., were routinely ignored when committed by Muslims against the Armenian peoples.

Before World War I, the Armenian people appealed to Russia for help and the Russian government attempted to get the ottoman government to recognize the rights of Armenians, but to no avail.

Though the commemoration day of the Armenian Genocide is April 24 (because of the mass execution of Armenian intellectuals, upper class, and leaders on April 24, 1915) almost any day could be used. The genocide did not happen just during World War I, but began twenty years earlier in 1894, and continued through 1923. Many of the foreigners who witnessed, first hand, the Armenian Genocide took photographs of what they saw, along with reporting back to their seniors what they were witnessing. Their photographs and reports exist today, though many (but not all) of the collaborating evidence in Turkey was destroyed by government officials. Many of these witnesses to the 20th centuries first genocide also wrote and published books about what they saw in Turkey.

Twenty-three countries and forty-three states within the United States have all adopted resolutions recognizing the Armenian Genocide. Why have 43 states within the United States passed such resolutions? Because the United States continues to deny the recognition of the Armenian Genocide. President Obama, during his first term, promised United States recognition of the genocide, but that recognition has still not happened. The president has stated that what happened was a genocide, but he has not officially recognized it as such. Each time a resolution comes before the United States Congress the Turkish government is able to stop it through its influence within the United States.

Here is the deal. History does not takes sides, history is simply what happened. We can “change our history” as the wife of an American politician wants us to do, or we can ignore history as the Turkish government wants us to do. But history is what has already happened. And you cannot change what has already happened.

The only honorable option to the Turkish government is to official recognize what its predecessors did and make amends as best as is possible.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under New

Something A Little Different Today.


No, 1500 word articles or meme’s. Nope not this week. This week is short. This week I am going to ask you to do something. Something that is very hard, hard enough I do not even know if we can go the distance. So, I am going to keep it short.

This past week I witnessed many things that gave me joy. I also witnessed some of the best of the worst we have to offer as a “civilized society.” The surprising thing is that some of the most hateful things came from those who like to tell us how loving they are, some of the most intolerant things came from those always proclaiming how tolerant they are.

So, here it is.

This is what we are going to do starting on Sunday April 19, 2015, and going for 24 hours.

Just you and me. Don’t worry about those other people.

For 24 hours you and I are not going to say anything negative. We are not going to communicate anything negative (yup we are going to rest our middle finger for 24 hours).

When someone really ticks us off, or mistreats us or someone else we are going to do just one thing, and nothing else.

Smile.

Yup, that’s it. Smile. No words or actions. Just smile.

Then next week, some time during the week, you and I are going to come back here and say how we did for 24 hours.

It’ll be our little secret. Just between you and me.

Good luck!

**smile**

Comments Off on Something A Little Different Today.

Filed under New

Titanic Photographs, and All Other Topics for that Matter.


This is for the benefit of Ian, and the other individuals who have attempted to use this site for their own benefit.

1. No comment which is disrespectful by word or tone to: the author, a reader or readers, another commenter, this site or anyone associated with it, shall be approved. Derogatory comments or references, bad language, and condescending or sarcastic comments will also not be approved.

2. Stating opinion as fact without accompanying evidence to back up your opinion will also prevent your opinion from being posted.

3. READ PREVIOUS COMMENTS! If the comment you wish to make has already been made and answered, your comment will not be approved, unless you offer something new.

4. Of particular importance to the many Titanic fans. Books and websites are NOT primary source material (read below or follow the provided link for primary source description). If you wish to see a major rewrite of an article then you must provide primary source material to back up your claim.

5. Over the last four years many authors and writers have contributed articles to our website. We do not edit the writers and authors, though we do require them to be respectful of our readers, staff, and those who desire to leave comments. We do give our contributors more leeway as to source material. But, as always not all articles reflect the opinion of this site, the staff, or other contributors. There are more than 400 postings on this site. We do not agree with each and every article, however it is presented for our audience. We are continuing to provide new articles on a variety of topics for our audience every week. Our attention is on the future and we are not going to spend our time answering comments which have already been asked and answered while not providing anything new. Our time is spent on searching for new topics and authors to bring to our audience.

6. There are many people who have spent a lifetime studying the Titanic and the persons and circumstances surrounding that great ship. If you have a theory or opinion (that has not already been addressed on our site) that you would like to put forth state it as such without being condescending or sarcastic, and state that it is your opinion. You will see your comment approved even if we do not agree with it.

7. If you have a Titanic web site which you think some or all of our readers would be interested in please do the following and we will tell our readers about your web site in one of our weekly articles. 1-we do not recommend web sites which are condescending, derogatory, sarcastic, or disrespectful to others. 2-After we determine that your website does not violate number 1 we will write a short article describing what your website has to offer readers, or if you prefer you may write the article and we will post it as our weekly article. 3- leave the following information in a comment (the information will not be released to the public and will be kept in confidence) your full name, the full name and e-mail address of a contact person which someone on our staff may exchange e-mails with, and the address for the website.

8. If you wish to write an article on Titanic or any other topic for our website send us your request as a comment. We will need your full name, e-mail address, and the topic you would like to write on. We will not release any of your information to the public. We will then send you an invitation as a contributor to our site. You will set up your own password and be able to submit your article directly to our editor so that in may be added to the queue of up coming articles. If there is a specific date you would like your article to be published on please include that as a note to the editor at the end of your article. ANY person wishing to write an article for us will be given an opportunity as long as their article remains respectful of others. The only restriction we have is that all articles must be submitted in English. The age, sex, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, political beliefs, and economic class are not considered when accepting articles. If you are old enough to write, you are old enough to write for us. If you can write your article in English, or have someone translate it for you, you can write for us.

9. There are many good websites on the Titanic that we have recommended to readers before and will continue to recommend in the future. Some of these websites have articles we do not agree with, but because the overall site is good and respectful we will continue to recommend them. One of the sites we recommend supports the theory that the Titanic did not complete the “port-around” maneuver that First Officer Murdoch was attempting. We have posted an article using physics to disprove this theory, yet we continue to recommend the site because of its many good articles. Another website puts forward the theory that First Officer Murdoch did absolutely nothing for 30 seconds after being informed of the iceberg ahead of the Titanic. We showed that theory to be incorrect based on the physical limitations of the Titanic’s steam operated steering gear, watch standing procedures, and the laws of physic. This site we also continue to recommend even though we disagree with this one article, because of the many fine articles on the site.

10. PRIMARY SOURCE MATERIAL – original material that has not been changed, altered or distorted in any way that can be traced back to the event(s) or individual(s).

11. SECONDARY SOURCE MATERIAL – uses primary source material as a reference, examples include: books, newspaper & magazine articles, blogs & websites, movies & television programs.

3 Comments

Filed under New

It Is All A Matter OF Perspective


I was checking out the last three cities on my “move to list” and was headed back to Columbus when my Civic decided 250,000 miles was enough. I nursed it from Cincinnati to Columbus. Then on the following Monday I bought a truck. I had some of my friends telling me how sorry they were about that.

I’m not. You see when I move I was going to have to use a U-Haul. And if you have ever moved you know how that goes.

“Yes, I am moving 1,000 miles away and I need to rent a truck.”

“Oh. Well, I can’t rent you any of my trucks. These are only for local use. Let me give you directions to the one-way dealer.”

Two hours later when you finally arrive at that “other” U-Haul dealer you are in a section of town that makes the back side of town look not so bad after-all. And the truck you get to rent to go one-way? Yeah. It was one of the last trucks that Henry Ford himself actually turned a wrench on. Gas mileage? If you can get 10 m.p.g. you’ll be doing good. But, yeah, at least the bailing wire that is holding it together is new.

Nope, I don’t need to do any of that. I bought a nice little used truck. Didn’t cost much and my insurance will be less than what the Civic was. Now I’ll just put my stuff in the back and put Columbus in my rearview mirror. It is all a matter of perspective.

Next week is also my daughter’s birthday. Not Elizabeth, her birthday is in a month. No April 10, will be Alex’s 11th birthday. Alexandra Elizabeth Combs, my first born, Elizabeth’s older sister. There are so many things Alex taught me. Things no one else could have taught me. More than that are the gifts she gave to me and her baby sister.

What she taught me was the power of my own love for another person. No one expected her to last 30 minutes. But she lasted for more than 90 minutes. I marveled at that, she was so tiny. Where did she get the strength I asked the nurse. The nurse’s answer was just two words, “From you.” She stayed with me, in my arms, until I told her it was ok for her to go. Then within just a couple of minutes, she was gone.

The precious gift she gave to her little sister? A better dad than she would have had. Because of Alex, I know how important each minute is with Elizabeth. I am not the dad I want to be, but I am a better dad than I would have been without Alex.

The gift she gave to me? The chance to help other dads who are grieving. Like my friend Matt who just lost his little girl. I have walked in his shoes and understand like only a father who has lost a little one can understand.

You see, in life, there are many things that happen that we have no control over. But, we can control how we perceive those events and what we do afterwards.

It is, after all, a matter of perspective.

Comments Off on It Is All A Matter OF Perspective

Filed under birth defects and premature births, family, New